Christopher Rudge

Promoting Cosmetic Procedures and the Duty to Warn of Risks

What are the implications of the TGA’s stricter approach to cosmetic treatment promotions? And how might the TGA’s regulatory approach interact with the law of negligence that requires practitioners to warn patients of inherent material risks?

Late-career doctors: Too dangerous to diagnose patients?

Today I’ve written a short reflection on AHPRA and the Medical Board of Australia’s (MBA) proposed options to reform the regulation of ‘late-career medical practitioners’ — ie, doctors over 70 years old — by requiring them to undergo regular health assessments. I will mostly let my short analysis published in the Conversation, speak for itself. […]

Recent writing: ‘SBVs’ and ‘GMOs’

The most recent two issues of the Journal of Law and Medicine carry articles authored or co-authored by me. The first is lead-authored by Mike O’Connor (with me and Cameron Stewart) and is titled ‘Sexual Boundary Violations by Doctors – Context, Regulatory Consequences and Preventive Strategies’ (see PMID 38761390). In that paper, we discuss the […]

Interview on genome editing and xenotransplantation

A genome-edited pig kidney I was pleased to be invited to reflect on the future of xenotransplantation and human genome editing recently in an interview on ABC’s The World with Beverley O’Connor. The interview was broadcast following news of the unfortunate passing of Richard “Rick” Slayman — the first human to have received a genome-edited […]

CRISPR’d pig kidneys for xenotransplantation

Last week, the biotech firm eGenesis supplied a donor kidney sourced from a genome-edited pig to a surgical team at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in the US. The donated kidney was transplanted into a patient with end-stage renal disease whose existing kidney transplant (‘allotransplanted’ from a human) was wearing out. The FDA had granted an […]

Will a crackdown end the botox boom?

Last Wednesday (8 March 2024) I was featured on the ABC News Daily podcast, thanks to researcher Bridget Fitzgerald and host Sam Hawley. We discuss the crackdown on botox and cosmetic procedures in Australia and what it will mean for patients. The episode is available here.

On Fidge v Pfizer [2024] FCA 161

Fidge v Pfizer is notable for making several provisional holdings. Among those was Rofe J’s holding that it is not a ‘necessary incident of medical practice’ for doctors to challenge government decisions based on alleged breaches of legislation, even when done in a purported attempt to protect patients’ health.

Risk regulation conference paper; the thalidomide apology; and unlawful welfare convictions

In late November, I presented a paper via video link to the Australasian Association of Bioethics and Heath Law (AABHL) on ‘risk-based regulation.’ The abstract for that paper was as follows: What risk? A critical analysis of risk-based regulation of therapeutic goods, from stem cell medicine to osseointegration devices Therapeutic goods (medicines, biologicals and devices) […]

Exa-cel on review at the FDA

Exa-cel and the FDA review Just last week, on 31 October, the FDA’s Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee met to discuss Vertex Pharma’s Biologics License Application for Exagamglogene autotemcel (or exa-cel, and formerly known as CTX-001) — a cell-based gene therapy designed to treat sickle-cell diseases. I have written about exa-cel many times […]

Risk-based regulation of cellular therapies in Australia

Yesterday I delivered a presentation on the regulation of stem cell-based interventions in Australia, focusing on the theory and practice of risk-based regulation and on some new developments in this regulatory environment. The talk was a part of the Cellular Horizons research grant that has been awarded to a team of scholars of which I […]

New ACT Bill to protect bodily rights of intersex people

The proposed ACT approval model Recently, I was interviewed by the young journalistic team at SIX News Australia about a Bill that the ACT Government introduced into its single-house Parliament in late March 2023. As I see it, the proposed Bill, if passed, will be transformative. And in a good way. It will require interventions […]

Doctors may soon get official ‘endorsements’ to practise cosmetic surgery – but will that protect patients?

Disturbing reports about botched cosmetic surgeries and injuries in Australia – from breast augmentations causing chronic pain to liposuction leaving patients with lifelong injuries – have sparked concerns in recent years. Several high-profile cosmetic surgeons alleged to have fallen short of expected professional standards have been disciplined. Last year, a class action was commenced against […]

Interview on Eastside FM

I recently published an article in the Conversation on proposed changes to the regulation of cosmetic surgery in Australia here. In essence, the state and territory Health Ministers have decided, after three years of consultation, to make the title ‘surgeon,’ as well as ‘cosmetic surgeon,’ a protected title. This will mean that cosmetic surgeons will […]