Christopher Rudge

Risk regulation conference paper; the thalidomide apology; and unlawful welfare convictions

In late November, I presented a paper via video link to the Australasian Association of Bioethics and Heath Law (AABHL) on ‘risk-based regulation.’ The abstract for that paper was as follows: What risk? A critical analysis of risk-based regulation of therapeutic goods, from stem cell medicine to osseointegration devices Therapeutic goods (medicines, biologicals and devices) […]

Chelmsford’s Legacy: Regulating Experimental Brain Interventions in the Public Interest

The following is an abstract recently submitted to the organisers of a neuroscience and society conference in Sydney. It combines two projects that I’m currently working on: the first, a paper on “the public interest” under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW); and the second, a paper on the Chelmsford scandal from the perspective of the legislative and regulatory history of psychiatry and medicine in NSW in the 1960s through to the 1990s.